Bass Fishing HomeBass Fishing Forums

Go Back   BassFishin.Com Forums > Serious Conversation Only > Techniques, Strategy & Presentations

Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 03-25-09, 07:33 PM   #1
BassFishin.Com Super Veteran
Wishing2BFishing's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Morgantown, Pa
Posts: 1,254
Default Lew's Speed Spool dubbed "groundbreaking piece of equipment"

Featuring the First Palming Plate and a Disengaging Level-Wind
If you saw the title phrase in a magazine reel advertisement today, you’d more than likely say, “So?” But, if you were reading that advertisement in say, 1976, you’d not only be intrigued but pumped by the fact that the company had taken steps to increase your cast length and make the reel more ergonomic (I don’t even think the study of ergonomics was around in 1976) for the angler.

Up until the mid-70s, casting reels were heavy, featured the spool-tension knob on the sideplate opposing the handle (I could have said left sideplate but I wanted to respect you wrong-handed casters) and some, like the Ambassadeur 5000, didn’t even have bearings but brass bushings. At that time, the popular baitcasting manufacturers were Ambassadeur (ABU-Garcia), Diawa (the Millionaire series), Shakespeare and Pflueger with the most popular, in terms ruggedness and castability, being the first mentioned.

The deal was everyone used them with confidence and pride because there was no other benchmark in which baitcasting reels were judged. Ignorance is bliss.

That all changed in the mid-70s when Lew Childre turned the baitcasting reel industry on its ear with the new Lew’s Speed Spool. I remember the first time I saw one in a tackle store – the reel looked goofy, almost like half a reel due to the fact the left sideplate had no spool-tension knob on it. It also had a strange shape that, unbeknownst to me, was actually a design feature to improve casting distance.

So, what did the new reel offer compared to the old standbys and why was it so earth shattering?

As stated earlier, the reel was the first to offer a handle-side spool-tension knob which allowed the overall reel width to be decreased significantly. This may seem like a minor adjustment to today’s anglers but it was the foundation of all future reel designs to come. It allowed anglers to more comfortably palm their reels which resulted in less hand fatigue over the course of a day’s fishing.

The second breakthrough this reel possessed was the disengaging level-wind. Childre was obsessed with designing a reel that would cast further than any other reel on the market. He knew that moving parts create friction and therefore by designing the reel so the level-wind didn’t move back and forth during the cast would decrease distance-hogging friction and result in longer casts.

The third advance was the line-guide itself. Childre, who played a major role in the design of the then-new Fuji ceramic guides, decided that if these guides would increase cast length by placing them on a rod, it should do the same if using one as the line-guide on a level-wind. Childre also located the line-guide as far away from the spool as possible, thus decreasing even more friction during the cast (and the reason for its strange shape).

The fourth major contribution this reel presented was the fact that it was low-profile. Although the height of the reel was the same as its counterparts, the reel foot was placed higher towards the centerline of the reel in order for it to sit lower on the rod. Another ergonomic aspect that many anglers didn’t notice until they fished it.

The Lew’s Speed Spool also offered a larger drag surface-area, which drastically increased drag smoothness and nearly solved the problem of drag stick, a problem that the competition had always fought. Childre also placed the best enclosed bearings (2) that could affordably be placed in a reel at the time and rounded out the reel with a paddle-style power handle instead of the small single-knob handles that were standard on the competition’s reels of the time.

To today’s angler, these improvements may not seem to be a big deal but at the time they spawned a revolution in the reel design industry. So much so that Shimano, the original equipment manufacturer of the Speed Spool, broke ties with Lew Childre and Son’s to embark on a new venture in 1977 to introduce their own Bantam line of fishing reels. At that time, Shimano had only been a manufacturer of high-end bicycle parts.

If one compares today’s reels to the Speed Spool of 1976, there are few differences. In fact, every reel produced today has each of the features the Speed Spool introduced. Only the incorporation of more bearings, magnets and even electronic braking systems are the only deviations from the original design.

Over the years I owned more than a dozen of the BB1 Speed Spools. Unfortunately, as I replaced them with more state-of-the-art reels, I gave them away to friends, as parts reels, or collectors. I wish I had kept one of them just for posterity as they were truly a groundbreaking piece of equipment.
Wishing2BFishing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-09, 07:48 PM   #2
BassFishin.Com Active Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brandon Mississippi
Posts: 480

I agree. The Lews reel is A very important part of the history of our sport for exactly the reasons you stated. I hated to see them go.
abu4600 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-09, 09:06 PM   #3
BassFishin.Com Super Veteran
aikenyounggun's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: aiken, SC
Posts: 2,051

im a youngin so that was a great history lesson..... we should have more post like that showin how things advanced and affect how we fish..... probably gonna goolge a pic
<>< Rather be Fishing ><>
aikenyounggun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-09, 01:47 AM   #4
BassFishin.Com Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Somewhere out there
Posts: 734

I was dazzled by the ORIGINAL (Shimano-built, I think, the one with the spring-loaded oiling ports.)) BB1 but thought 100 bux was over the top, pricewise. I was a devoted 4500C/4600c Amby fan as it was. Soon, about three months after they hit the stores here in San Antonio, I acquired the first of the five BB1s I'd ultimately own.
I was hanging out at a bud's tackle store on fine day when an older gentleman came in carrying a still-in-box-and-velvet bag BB1. Since I was looking after the place while my pal was out to lunch I greeted him and asked how I might be of assistance. He replied that he'd won the reel in some sort of raffle but was strictly a Zebco man and wanted to trade it for the top-model Zebco One...all 25 dollars worth thereof. I bought the reel from him for 25 bux and he in turn used the money to purchase the Omega One. Neat, huh?
Within maybe two months I acquired another one from a guy who had been given the real for Xmas but could not manage to cast without it "Running away with me", as he put it. That one I got for 40 clams.
The next three were given to me by the widow of a fine man, Tom H., when he passed away. Two had never had line on them.
I sold the last one of the five to a collector in Hondo TX last year. Perhaps I should have held on to that one.

Anyway, there was one quirk re the BB1 that relates to the reel foot which was very short with each end angled down a bit. The first time I fished with one it was attached to a Lew's Speed Stick Graphite rod. So far so good.
However, on the very first worm bite of the day, when I set the hook, the reel popped out of the seat and nearly flew over the side. I managed to catch it in mid-air but then had a rod in one hand, reel in the other, and an irate bass (3lbs+) on the end of the line. For a moment or two I was busier than a monkey making love to a football.
There was definitely a flaw in the foot design that manifested itself when the rod handle flexed under strain. The older metal reel handles were not so affected but all my rods, custom and store-bought alike, had those Fuji grips and all had a tendency to shed the BB1 on a hookset or with a hard pull against a fish or snag.
I solved the problem by engineering a tiny shim, shaped like <, and made of the hard and thick paper you find on the back of a legal pad, which I forced into the rear of the reel seat. That somehow stopped the feared SRRE (Spontaneous Reel Rejection and Ejection) once and for all.
The later version, minus the oiling ports, was made (I think) by Ryobi and somehow wasn't the same to us.
Before too long the new hi-tech Daiwas, the MM series and the Magforces, came on the scene, and my BB1s, (the four that I'd actually used,) were retired. One by one they were given away or sold to collectors until, years later, the fifth one, still a virgin, went west to Hondo.
Yes, they were special. Had they been lighter in weight I might still be using one, perhaps for cranks, since the ratio was about 5:1.

Lancer6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-09, 10:16 AM   #5
BassFishin.Com Super Veteran
Wishing2BFishing's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Morgantown, Pa
Posts: 1,254

Note: I did not write this article. It is from a blog that I read on another site. I found it interesting so I posted it on this forum.
Wishing2BFishing is offline   Reply With Quote

Disclosure / Disclaimer
Before acting on the content posted, you should know that BassFishin.Com may benefit financially and otherwise from content, advertising, links or otherwise from anything you click on, read, or look at on our website. Click here to read our Disclosure Policy and Disclaimer.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
2013 BassFishin.Com LLC