06-24-08, 05:16 PM | #1 |
BassFishin.Com Super Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,523
|
Line difference - mono vs. fluoro
What is the difference between fluorocarbon and monofilament line? Is one better for certain situations or is it just a personal preference?
|
06-24-08, 06:55 PM | #2 |
BassFishin.Com Active Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 499
|
They're both made by the same process, but with different polymers.
Mono= Lower price, more stretch, good knot strength, abrasion resistant, floats and comes in a lot of different colors but is not translucent under water, etc. goes "bad" from UV exposure, age, twist and kinks, absorbs water. Fluoro= Higher price, very minimal stretch (if any), good knot strength if the proper knot is used, stronger than mono at the same diameter, very abrasion resistant, sinks and is translucent under water (some manufacturers make colored fluoro for guys who want the benies other than translucency), not affected by UV, water or age, bad for breaking off from twisting and kinking. I use fluorocarbon for leader line or if I'm fishing clear or pressured water. Sometimes, I'll spool it on if I know I'm going to be fishing a lot of rocks, although it might not be the right line for topwater or main line float-n-fly because it sinks. Other than that, I use mono or braid. |
06-24-08, 07:01 PM | #3 | |
BassFishin.Com Premier Elite
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Webb City, MO
Posts: 6,387
|
Quote:
__________________
You only live once. But if you do it right, once is enough. |
|
06-24-08, 07:03 PM | #4 |
BassFishin.Com Active Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 499
|
C-rig, you've probably already posted this, but what brand do you prefer?
|
06-24-08, 09:24 PM | #5 |
BassFishin.Com Super Veteran
|
Pig, I thought fluoro was less abrasion resistant than mono?
|
06-24-08, 09:58 PM | #6 |
BassFishin.Com Premier Elite
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Webb City, MO
Posts: 6,387
|
i love seaguar invizx
__________________
You only live once. But if you do it right, once is enough. Last edited by carolina-rig-01; 06-24-08 at 10:18 PM. |
06-24-08, 10:33 PM | #7 |
BassFishin.Com Active Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 499
|
I'll give the Seaguar line a try this summer...just another reason to product test/comparison shop.
Buzz- Fluoro is an odd animal. It is MORE abrasion "resistant" than mono, but once it does become knicked or abraided it tends to be weaker than mono at that point. It's actually a very strong, tough line that many of the pros are using almost exclusively for everything but topwater. Like several of the guys on the board, I'm waiting for a fluoro to hit the market that can withstand the stresses that mono or braid can. And, if they could make it float a little, it might be the perfect line. Well, a truly translucent braid with some stretch might be even better... But, those are just my thoughts. |
06-24-08, 10:44 PM | #8 | |
BassFishin.Com Premier Elite
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Webb City, MO
Posts: 6,387
|
Quote:
while i may not have too many tricks up my sleeve i do have one that may help you out. if you take some sort of wax fly tying wax works well but i imagine something like chap stick would do the trick. coat a couple feet of your flourocarbon line (right above your topwater bait) the line will float and not hinder the action of your topwater bait.
__________________
You only live once. But if you do it right, once is enough. |
|
06-24-08, 10:48 PM | #9 |
BassFishin.Com Active Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 499
|
Man, excellent!! Yet again, a solution was right there the whole time! Maybe I'll send my pet duck out for some chap stick....the drug store might let him put it on his bill!!! Thanks for the tip, C-rig!
|
06-25-08, 02:05 AM | #10 |
BassFishin.Com Super Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: WA State
Posts: 1,783
|
This is my line too. It was the first fc line I ever tried and I have never ever seen a need to change.
The only thing I will differ on is that fc line does stretch, and in some cases more than a comparable mono. This however does not mean it is a bad thing. Also, while both lines have stretch, mono is more resilient. When mono gets stretched, it will usually contract back to the same size it was before the stretch. However with fc line, it will tend to not rebound back and stay stretched. However, with a properly set drag and the use of a rod rated for the line, this stretch in the line should not even be an issue. I use Seaguar Invizx in 6# line for my drop shot rig and I have never ever lost a fish from dink to 5.5# Invizx rocks!!!
__________________
ARX "If people concentrated on the really important things in life, there'd be a shortage of fishing poles." Doug Larson (Shimano 2005 Reel Catalog) |
06-25-08, 09:24 AM | #11 |
BassFishin.Com Active Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 499
|
Islandbass- I got to thank you for mentioning fluoro's stretch. Honestly, at first I really disagreed about that. But, I did a little research and found out that you are 100% right! There are some brands that actually have more stretch than mono (wet/dry tests). I had always heard and read that fluoro has very little stretch-- seems that's not the whole story after all. Good call, Island!
|
06-25-08, 04:08 PM | #12 |
BassFishin.Com Super Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,030
|
Whatīs the difference between fluorocarbon and NYLON ? there are lots of differences, being the most important ones:
Fluorocarbon is impervious to the elements and UV rays which damage and degrade nylon ( flourocarbon in that aspect is superior to nylon, in theory it should last longer ) Fluorcarbon doesnīt absorbs water like nylon does ( water absortion affects how the line behaves, after a good soak nylon stretches more ) Fluorcarbon is more abrassion resistant than nylon of the same diameter Flouorcarbon stretches as much as nylon but with one difference, once fluorcarbon stretches itīs stretched for good while nylon returns to itīs original length. ( nicks when professional overruns happen in baitcasters damage severely fluorocarbon line, the same applies when tying a knot ) Fluorocarbon is denser than nylon ( which means it transmits vibration better than nylon making it better for techniques where feel is important like in worming or jigging ) Fluorocarbon has a refraction degree similar to the water which makes it less visible than nylon ( nope itīs not "invisible", itīs a lot less visible ) so in places and conditions where you are faced with extremely high water visibility fish are less able to detect it. Fluorocabon is not manufactured in the many forms nylon is manufactured, so you can only choose one while in nylon you can choose between several degrees of limpness or several degrees of abrassion resistance. Which one is best overall ? none, the perfect fishing line hasnīt been developed yet. Fluoro is great for certain applications, nylon is for others, the same applies to copoly and braided. |
06-25-08, 04:55 PM | #13 | |
BassFishin.Com Super Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: WA State
Posts: 1,783
|
Quote:
You and me both!! I was surprised when I found out. Research done by a guy who goes by the screen name of fishing elbow is where I first learned about it and tackle tour's findings backed it up. Then In Fisherman does an article on it and refers to Takle Tour's work. You are going to love Invizx. seaguar invizx might seem and feel "stretchy" but don't let that bother. This line will deliver for you.
__________________
ARX "If people concentrated on the really important things in life, there'd be a shortage of fishing poles." Doug Larson (Shimano 2005 Reel Catalog) |
|
Disclosure / Disclaimer
Before acting on the content posted, you should know that BassFishin.Com may benefit financially and otherwise from content, advertising, links or otherwise from anything you click on, read, or look at on our website. Click here to read our Disclosure Policy and Disclaimer. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|