Bass Fishing HomeBass Fishing Forums

Go Back   BassFishin.Com Forums > Serious Conversation Only > Techniques, Strategy & Presentations
FAQ Community Members List Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 03-10-11, 10:12 PM   #1
BigBurlyBass
BassFishin.Com Active Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: detroit
Posts: 188
Default confused?

OK, so Skeet Reese's 7.0:1 gear ratio baitcasting reel brings in 27.5 inches of line per turn of the handle, now the 6.2:1 gear ratio reel brings in 23.5 inches of line so what I am wondering is this reel is on the "slower" side so I should get the 7.0:1 gear ratio for the more speed, which is actually 6.4:1 gear ratio's inches per turn. It is slower than most 7.0:1 gear raito reels, but does it have any more tourk? the 6.2:1 is really slow, it has the speed of a 5.3:1 gear ratio speed. so should I go with more speed or tourk on this one?


Thanks.
BigBurlyBass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-11, 10:44 PM   #2
BigBassin144
BassFishin.Com Premier Elite
 
BigBassin144's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 9,463
Send a message via AIM to BigBassin144
Default

This must be a preference of Skeets because his signature Revo with 6.4:1 reels in 24 IPT.

The long handles will give you more torque, as will a lower gear. It depends on what you're doing with the reel. If you're fishing cranks, I'd go with the lower IPTs. Anything else, I'd go with the higher IPT. I actually like something around 32" for jigs, worms, etc. and around 28" for things like spinnerbaits.

BB
__________________
As of June 14, 2014 the members of the BF.com forum have moved to basschat.yuku.com!
BigBassin144 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-11, 11:01 PM   #3
Pharticus
BassFishin.Com Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 19
Default

Where are you getting these #'s?

A 7.0 means the spool turns 7x's per revolution of the handle. Is the circumference of the spool REALLY 4"? I haven't seen the thing, but that seems way too big.
Pharticus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-11, 11:05 PM   #4
BigBurlyBass
BassFishin.Com Active Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: detroit
Posts: 188
Default

I will Be using It for mostly everything, BUT, cranks
BigBurlyBass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-11, 11:26 PM   #5
BigBassin144
BassFishin.Com Premier Elite
 
BigBassin144's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 9,463
Send a message via AIM to BigBassin144
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pharticus View Post
Where are you getting these #'s?

A 7.0 means the spool turns 7x's per revolution of the handle. Is the circumference of the spool REALLY 4"? I haven't seen the thing, but that seems way too big.
Where did you get 4" from?


Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBurlyBass View Post
I will Be using It for mostly everything, BUT, cranks
Then I'd go with the higher IPT.

BB
__________________
As of June 14, 2014 the members of the BF.com forum have moved to basschat.yuku.com!
BigBassin144 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-11, 01:54 AM   #6
Pharticus
BassFishin.Com Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 19
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBassin144 View Post
Where did you get 4" from?
28" per crank divided by 7 spool rotations = 4"
Pharticus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-11, 08:07 AM   #7
BigBassin144
BassFishin.Com Premier Elite
 
BigBassin144's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 9,463
Send a message via AIM to BigBassin144
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pharticus View Post
28" per crank divided by 7 spool rotations = 4"
ah, ok. I guess I didn't think of that. DOH! lol. Anyways, that seems feasible, since the diameter would be approximately 1-1/4" if the circumference in 4".

To answer your original question, the retrieve rates are provided by the manufacturer and can be found on some retail sites like BPS.

BB
__________________
As of June 14, 2014 the members of the BF.com forum have moved to basschat.yuku.com!
BigBassin144 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-11, 12:16 PM   #8
BigBurlyBass
BassFishin.Com Active Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: detroit
Posts: 188
Default

Yeah the higer inches per turn still should have a good amount of tourk because of the longer handle right? why, because I have a citica in a 6.4:1 ratio, and throwing a spinner bait on that the handle is pretty hard to turn, and so since the 7.0:1 has less tourk I don't want the handle to be really hard to turn but the longer handle should make up for the gear ratio right?
BigBurlyBass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-11, 12:54 PM   #9
MississippiBoy
BassFishin.Com Super Veteran
 
MississippiBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ridgeland MS
Posts: 3,923
Default

You've got a good grasp on it, I think. Longer handle, less inches per turn retrieval speed, and a lower gear ratio will all gain you more torque, with less speed. Whether or not an X.X:1 ratio reel with Y amount of IPT with a Z length handle will give you less/more torque/speed than a A.A:1 ratio reel with B amount of IPT with a C length handle is hard to judge.
All three measurements change the amount of effort needed to turn the handle. Whether a 7.0:1 ratio reel with a longer handle will be the same as a 6.4:1 with a shorter handle is anybody's guess, but the longer handle will help.
__________________
I smell smoke, and I hear sirens. Do you think that's a problem?
MississippiBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-11, 01:02 PM   #10
BigBassin144
BassFishin.Com Premier Elite
 
BigBassin144's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 9,463
Send a message via AIM to BigBassin144
Default

Yeah, MB's right. It'd be hard to tell you how the torque of THAT 7:1 reel with the long handle would compare to say the Citica. You'd have to run the numbers through some fancy math formula that maybe NFE can tell us.

I can tell you the 6.4:1 Skeet Reese Revo with the long handle cranks very easy. I don't know how much is due to the long handle though.

BB
__________________
As of June 14, 2014 the members of the BF.com forum have moved to basschat.yuku.com!
BigBassin144 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-11, 01:08 PM   #11
BigBurlyBass
BassFishin.Com Active Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: detroit
Posts: 188
Default

OK, It is looking like I am going to be getting the 7.0:1 because most topwaters you use the rod tip same with jerbaits and jigs and worms it is just the spinner bait that I am concerned about but... o well, haha. Welp, then I am hoping the longer handle will make up for the loss of tourk, It should,
BigBurlyBass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-11, 01:21 PM   #12
MississippiBoy
BassFishin.Com Super Veteran
 
MississippiBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ridgeland MS
Posts: 3,923
Default

Realistically, unless you're throwing something with a lot of drag, like a big deep-diving crankbait or a spinnerbait with a huge Colorado-style blade, the 7.0:1 will work just fine. 6.x:1 ratio reels are considered pretty much the "all-purpose" reels, with the slower 5.3:1 or so reels used for the high-drag lures, and the 7.0:1 "burners" used for something you really want to reel fast, such as waking spinnerbaits just below the surface.
__________________
I smell smoke, and I hear sirens. Do you think that's a problem?
MississippiBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-11, 01:27 PM   #13
BigBurlyBass
BassFishin.Com Active Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: detroit
Posts: 188
Default

23.5 inches per turn would make it harder to do certain techniques like jerkbaits and topwaters and worms cause you use the rod tip so a faster gear ratio would be better, but, I should be able to get away with the 7.0:1 because most of the time I will be reeling in just to pick up the slack line. I am not concerned about fighting the fish either.
BigBurlyBass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-11, 01:38 PM   #14
MississippiBoy
BassFishin.Com Super Veteran
 
MississippiBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ridgeland MS
Posts: 3,923
Default

We're saying the same thing....
__________________
I smell smoke, and I hear sirens. Do you think that's a problem?
MississippiBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-11, 02:07 PM   #15
BigBurlyBass
BassFishin.Com Active Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: detroit
Posts: 188
Default

OK. Thanks for your guys help i am gonna get the 7.0:1 gear ratio. I am glad that when I wen't to gander mountain they only had the 7.0:1 ratio cause I would have already had the 6.2:1 if they had them, but now I will go back to get the 7.0:1. haha
BigBurlyBass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-11, 05:56 PM   #16
bamabassman
BassFishin.Com Premier Elite
 
bamabassman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: cedar bluff, alabama
Posts: 15,292
Default

<<<still ocnfused, BWAHAAHAHAHHAHAHA!!! not really.
__________________
so many lures, so little time.
bamabassman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-11, 06:58 PM   #17
BigBurlyBass
BassFishin.Com Active Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: detroit
Posts: 188
Default

Hahahahahaha Nope not any more hahaha Thanks guys
BigBurlyBass is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Disclosure / Disclaimer
Before acting on the content posted, you should know that BassFishin.Com may benefit financially and otherwise from content, advertising, links or otherwise from anything you click on, read, or look at on our website. Click here to read our Disclosure Policy and Disclaimer.


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2013 BassFishin.Com LLC